Company Dispute and Litigation Analysis Court Cases Plus

Problem

In China company dispute practice, the hard part is often not finding one statute, but reconciling old and new law, conflicting judicial interpretations, administrative rules, and case-level reasoning scattered across sources. This skill targets the 2023 revised Company Law, five judicial interpretations, the 2025 draft for comments, related administrative rules, Supreme People's Court cases, typical debt-evasion cases, and curated Q&A. It is useful for shareholder capital contribution, equity transfer, resolution validity, inspection rights, profit distribution, derivative litigation, director and officer liability, dissolution and liquidation, VAM agreements, equity holding, and enforcement against shareholders.

How it works

The skill organizes reference material into topic-specific files: references/01-公司法全文.md, references/02-司法解释汇编.md, references/03-配套法规.md, references/04-典型案例.md, references/05-批复与法答网.md, and references/06-法答网精选答问.md. It first maps the user's facts to a dispute type, then searches statutes, interpretations, cases, and Q&A in parallel. It recommends using Grep with Chinese full-width article numbers to avoid loading entire files. Before citing specific articles, it verifies current validity through mcp__yuandian-mcp__yuandian_law_vector_search. For cases, it uses mcp__yuandian-mcp__yuandian_case_vector_search, filtered to civil cases after 2024-07-01, with optional province, city, or court constraints. If jurisdiction is not provided, it asks for confirmation before running a regional case search.

Limits

This is a research and reasoning aid, not formal legal advice. It should not present uncertain conclusions as certain. Cases without source URLs should not be cited directly. Complex matters such as VAM agreements, enforcement additions, and bankruptcy shareholder rights depend heavily on procedure, file-specific facts, and the latest judicial interpretations.