Figma Design to Modular Code

Problem

When translating a complex design in one pass, models often track page structure, tokens, breakpoints, and layout at once, causing inconsistent components, spacing drift, flattened hierarchy, and lost responsive behavior. The root issue is context overload, not simply code generation quality.

How It Works

figma2code separates planning from execution. It expects a connected Figma or Mastergo MCP server to read structured node data such as type, layout, and fills, and uses rendered images for visual comparison. Phase 1 confirms target framework, TypeScript, styling approach, existing component library, theme tokens, output path, responsive scope, interactions, and base width, then creates PLAN.md with tokens and a module list. Phase 2 produces COMPONENTS.md, merges repeated elements, decides whether to use, wrap, or build each component based on existing libraries such as Element Plus, Vant, Ant Design, shadcn/ui, or internal UI kits, and maps hover, disabled, and loading variants. Phase 3 builds in the order token, primitive, composite, and module. Each unit is grounded in node data and a 2x rendered reference, with required fixes for color, spacing, font size, and layout differences. Phase 4 assembles the page, checks cross-module consistency and breakpoints, and provides a handoff list including generated files, reused components, logged differences, usage notes, dependencies, and intentional deviations.

Boundaries

It is best for pages with multiple sections, repeated components, or poor one-shot conversion results; a single small button does not need the full workflow. Without a design MCP, screenshots cannot replace structured node data for spacing, color, and typography tokens. Mini-program, Flutter, SwiftUI, and React Native targets need extra care for rpx, safe areas, native layering, line-height, and shadow behavior. Interactions, animations, empty states, error states, and accessibility should be scoped explicitly rather than inferred from static screenshots.